Searching for information with AI
On this page, you will learn how to use AI to search for information, such as scientific articles, for your studies. You will get hands-on advice as well as an understanding of how the tools work.
How do AI search tools work?
The generative AI technology used in chatbots such as ChatGPT, Copilot and other AI search tools is called Large Language Models (LLMs). A large language model is a statistical model of human language and of what human-written texts usually look like. Chatbots and other AI search tools base their answers on probability calculations. In simple terms, this means that AI tools take your prompt (the text or question you typed) and generate an answer based on what is likely to be an answer. It is often said that models "hallucinate" when the answer does not match reality, that is, when they give incorrect or untrue answers. However, there is really no difference between what models do when they produce true versus untrue responses. In both instances, the AI tool has created text that matches what text usually looks like and what words usually appear together.
As a consequence, large language models may reproduce factual errors, stereotypes, or bias. They may also generate sources that sound credible but are, in fact, fabricated. Furthermore, different chatbots have been trained on, and have access to, different data. Chatbots such as ChatGPT and Copilot do not generate answers solely based on scientific material. AI search tools such as Elicit, Consensus, and Scite, on the other hand, have been designed to provide answers based on scientific publications, which they also provide references to. Some large language models have a built-in search tool that allows them to retrieve sources from, for example, Google, but not all. Therefore, you need to pay attention to how the AI tool you use works, and determine how you can best use it to generate the information you are looking for.
Example of question to KIB from researchers:
We read in a news article on a website about an interesting new research paper allegedly written by A and B. It is supposedly titled X, but we cannot find the article anywhere. Did A and B write this article, or could it be an AI fabrication?
KIB's answer:
Generative AI created this reference. The two researchers, A and B, exist and are both authorities in this field, but they have not written anything together. The reason AI generated this reference is that many AI models are based on probability. : A and B are two prominent researchers in the same field and it is probable that they could have written an article together. And if they had done so, it is likely that the article would have been titled X, based on what they had written before. The article, however, does not actually exist.
AI search tools that provide sources
There are AI search tools designed to retrieve real sources. These tools are often based on a large language model that is linked to a database or search engine through a technology called retrieval augmented generation (RAG). The technology allows the tool to retrieve real sources based on the prompt you have entered.
AI search tools can be connected both to more general search engines, such as Google, and to more scientifically orientated search engines, such as Semantic Scholar. In both instances, the large language model generates a text in response to your prompt using real sources. Please note, however, that AI search tools usually cannot access the full text. Instead, the generated text is based on abstracts.
Agent-based AI search tools
Agent-based AI search tools are helpful for tasks that require several steps. One example is the agent-based AI search tool Undermind, where a search for information is conducted in several steps. Simply put, you first chat with a chatbot that asks you to clarify exactly what you are looking for. Then, the tool generates prompts that are used to conduct more in-depth searches.
Snowball searching AI search tool
Some search tools use AI without being generative. These tools base their search on one or more articles that you have already identified to find similar articles. Snowball or citation searching is a search technique where you start from one relevant article to find more via, for example, reference lists or citations, or with AI search tools showing similar articles.
Quick facts
- Large language model is the generative AI technology found in chatbots and AI search tools such as ChatGPT, Copilot, Elicit and SciSpace.
- Large language models are statistical models based on probability calculations. Based on your prompt, they generate a probable answer based on the data they have access to. As a consequence, they may reproduce factual errors, stereotypes and biases.
- A large language model has no concept of what is true or false; it is only trained to generate language. It may therefore generate text that is consistent with reality, but it can also generate content that is completely incorrect.
- A large language model cannot summarise a text but only shorten it, because the model can neither evaluate nor judge what is important in the text, nor assess sources, nor apply critical thinking. The summary you get may even be incorrect. Therefore, you always need to read the original sources carefully.
- ChatGPT and Copilot provide answers that have not been generated based solely on scientific texts. If you need scientific information, use AI search tools specifically based on scientific material.
- Some large language models are linked to a database or search engine that uses a technology called RAG (retrieval augmented generation). These tools may provide real references.
- AI search tools usually do not have access to the full text, but base their answers on abstract s.
- AI search tools do not clarify why they have highlighted particular articles; the selection process is not transparent. Further, these tools cannot think critically or evaluate sources and the quality of the selected sources may therefore vary. You always need to check all sources carefully.
What AI search tools can I use?
If you need scientific articles, avoid using ChatGPT or Copilot. These tools are large language models not intended solely for academic use. As a result, you may end up with sources that are either fabricated or not scientific. Instead, you should use AI search tools that are designed to retrieve scientific articles. They work in slightly different ways and generate their answers based on scientific material. However, since AI search tools will search among a large amount of material, often hundreds of millions of articles, the results may include problematic studies or articles published in predatory journals. It is therefore important that you always review the articles you get from AI search tools to ensure that they are credible.
Questions to ask yourself when choosing a tool:
- How does it work?
- What types of search queries or prompts work best for this particular tool?
- Where does the tool search?
- Are the articles credible?
Here is a list of tools aimed at searching for information within academia. Please note that the list is not exhaustive and that you need to take responsibility for using the tools ethically and in a manner appropriate to your task. You can read more about AI and ethics here. The tools work in different ways, so you need to familiarise yourself with how they work, how to protect your data and not infringe copyright.
AI search tools based on a large language model with RAG
- Consensus (Free version available. No account required.)
- Elicit (Free version available. Account required.)
- Scispace (Free version available. No account required.)
- Scite (Free version available. Account required.)
- Perplexity (Free version available. No account required.)
- Scinapse (Free version available. No account required.)
- EvidenceHunt (Free version available. Account required.)
- Scholarcy (Free version available. Account required.)
Agent-based AI search tools (the search is conducted in several steps)
- Undermind (Free version available. Account required.)
- Gemini Deep research (Free version available. No account required.)
- Claude 3.7 (Free version available. Account required.)
Snowball AI search tool (the tools find articles similar to one you have already)
- ResearchRabbit (Free version available. Account required.)
- Connectedpapers (Free version available. No account required.)
- Litmaps (Free version available. No account required.)
Can an AI search tool be used as a source?
An AI search tool is not a source. You must read any text you find through an AI-generated search in order to cite it in your own text. At KI, any references in your text should be written in APA or Vancouver. Read more about sources and how to reference here.
When can an AI search tool be used?
AI search tools are often perceived as more intuitive than traditional databases, as you may use natural language instead of keywords and Boolean operators. However, remember that AI search tools often conceal complex processes involved in searching, making your search less transparent.
Where you should search for information – in course literature and books, via Google, via a scientific database or via an AI search tool – depends on the purpose of your search and your requirements for the task or the answer. Before you start searching, you need to identify why you are searching for information to determine which approach to take. AI search tools may be suitable at certain stages of your search process. Below is a brief description of three different phases of the search process.
- Explorative phase of your search process? AI search tools may be useful.
- Complementary and snowball searching? AI search tools may be useful.
- Systematic and exhaustive search? Using AI search tools is NOT sufficient. A structured, transparent and replicable search in databases is needed. Read more about structured and systematic searching in scientific databases.
Differences between traditional databases and AI search tools
Traditional databases and AI search tools differ in several ways: how they handle information, how they present results and what they require from you as a user. The table below shows some key differences that may help you decide which tool to use for different purposes.
Traditional databases (for example PubMed, CINAHL, Web of Science) | AI search tools (for example Elicit, Consensus, SciSpace) | |
Your search/prompt.. | …generates a list of references that match the search terms you enter. These may be ranked in different ways. | … often generates a text with real references, but it is often unclear why these particular articles have been highlighted. Sometimes, you also get a list of references. |
You search in... | … selected journals indexed in the databases, often according to certain subject areas. | … large numbers of articles and sources that have not always been indexed or selected, often interdisciplinary ones. |
You search using... | …search terms, meaning that you will only find articles that use the keywords you use. This is called a lexical search. | …natural language/prompts, and it is often useful to type out a comlete question. The search results do not have to include all the words you have typed in, but are matched anyway through a "semantic search". |
Suitable for: |
|
|
Quick facts
- Which tool you should choose depends on context. You always need to consider why you are searching and then decide where and how it is most appropriate to search.
- There are significant differences between traditional databases and AI search tools. For example, where they search, how they search, and what sources they have access to.
- AI search tools cannot summarise text or assess if an article is good, as they do not understand and cannot interpret the content of a text. They can only shorten the text.
- AI search tools can sometimes give wrong answers even if the source it refers to exists. Again, they do not understand and cannot interpret the content of the text.
- Chatbots such as ChatGPT and Copilot generate texts that are not based solely on scientific material. If you need scientific information, it is better to use AI search tools based on scientific material.
Prompt tips for AI search tools
When using AI search tools, you need to formulate a clear request to the tool (that is, prompt). The quality of the prompt determines the quality of the output. If you need scientific information, you need information that is both relevant and neutral. Ensure that your search does not introduce bias. Below, you will find less effective prompts for finding information, as well as more effective ones.
Less effective prompts
Why are these prompts less effective?
- The first consists of only a few words, not a full question. In these cases, AI tools will usually produce less helpful answers.
- Your question is biased. The phrasing assumes that melatonin could negatively affect dementia. The AI search tool may replicate that bias in its answers.
More effective prompts
Why is the prompt more effective?
- They are complete question, not just a few words.
- The question is objective and does not introduce bias.
Determine the purpose of your search before deciding if AI is an appropriate tool. If an AI search tool is suitable, use the checklist below to ensure that you are using the tool appropriately.
What is the aim of your search?
- Exploratory or complementary search? Yes, then AI search tools may be suitable
- When you want a basic idea of a topic or find some sample articles to start with.
- When you want to check if you missed any aspect of the topic.
- Systematic and exhaustive search? No, using AI search tools is not enough
- When you want to find all research on a given topic.
- When you need transparent and reproducible searches, for example for a systematic review.
- When you need to gather all the scientific evidence on a specific topic.
If you answer "yes" to the questions below, you have used the tool wisely. Otherwise, you need to reconsider your use.
- Have you asked complete questions when using the tool?
- Have you avoided introducing any values or biases into your question?
- Have you tried reformulating your question and prompting the AI tool again?
- Have you used several different tools?
- Do you know which sources the tool retrieves its information from?
- Are the sources scientific and peer-reviewed?
- Are the sources correctly cited, that is, can you trace the reference? If not, the tool may have fabricated the source.
- Can you verify the information against at least two other sources?
Also, keep in mind that it may be helpful to save your search history or the prompt. This is especially applicable if you are required to report your search strategies. You can read more about disclosing your AI use and copyright around AI here.
One reason that it can be difficult to decide whether and how to use AI is that AI is a new technology. We have not yet fully figured out how to use it responsibly and ethically. Drawing a parallel to a situation we are both more familiar and more comfortable with, such as getting help from a real person, can help us make decisions.
The “my friend Kim” principle can help you determine whether it is okay to use AI for something. Simply replace “AI” or "ChatGPT" with “my friend Kim.”
For example:
That does not sound okay, does it? Then it is not okay to use AI in this way either.
Why?
The example above is not okay, since you are responsible for what you produce and learn. You need to review the original articles yourself.
Does that sound okay? Then it is generally also okay to use ChatGPT or other AI tools in that way.
Why?
The example above would generally be considered okay because you are only using AI/Kim as a starting point in your search for information. You also take responsibility by checking the original sources to make sure they are of sound quality.
Of course, “my friend Kim” cannot always help you decide whether you can and should use AI in a certain way, but the principle might help you make a well-considered decision.
Watch a recorded lecture on AI and information searching by librarian Lovisa Liljegren and bibliometric analyst Alvin Gavel (from the KI day ‘AI in practice’, May 2024).
Exercise
Compare two different AI search tools for scientific articles, for example:
- Enter the same question into both search tools, about something in your field of research, or another area you know well. You can also use the example questions: "Is coffee good for you?" and "What does the latest research say about coffee and its effect on health?" Feel free to test both versions of the questions in both tools.
- Compare the summaries and references you get. What kind of references do you get? Are the references the same in both services? Why/why not? Is the summary correct? How can you verify it? Is there a risk of bias? What kind of bias?
Reflection
- When would you use a search like this? When would you not use it?
- What are the benefits and risks of using AI search for factual/scientific articles?

Keep in mind!
You are always responsible for your own learning and what you produce in your studies.
Make sure you do so with academic integrity, that is, be transparent about how you use AI tools and do not use them more than is permitted for your course.
Do not share personal information, sensitive data or copyrighted material with the tools.
If you would like us to get back to you, please submit your contact information in the form below along with your feeback.